trees

Knowing Your Costs – Part 3: “The Present vs The Future”

/0 Comments/in , , , /by

As a proud member of the Rider Nation, and loyal fan of the entire CFL (despite the goofy new rules for
2015,) I witnessed something happen on the weekend that blew up social media and has fans of the
Green & White frothing.

The struggling winless Riders have been devastated by injury and lack-luster performances on field,
especially defensively. The order of the game plan each week seems to be “who can we plug where?”
One of the criticisms from fans is that there has been inadequate planning on behalf of management to
bring in the right new talent to provide appropriate solutions at time of crisis (like injury.)

While the business of football is a mystery to me, the business of business is not. Like a football team,
your business will face crises and you’ll need to adjust quickly. It doesn’t have to be personnel related
(like a football team;) it could be asset related (like equipment catastrophe) or market related (like a
major price decline) or anything. The knee-jerk reactions that are commonplace during times of crisis
rarely bode well for outcomes.

In the case of my favorite football team, the knee jerk reactions have been to sign different players to
the roster regularly. This is meant to fill the gaps left by injury, unsatisfactory performance, etc. This
knee-jerk reaction creates an air of constant uncertainty among the remaining players, and rarely brings
instant results because new players need time to learn the system, and gel with their teammates so as
to function as a unit when on the field. Wouldn’t it be better to have developed some younger players
and keep them on a practice roster? Players who would have learned the system since training camp,
and who are just itching to get on the field and show their stuff?

Similar to your business when you face crises, you could follow the lead of this football team and simply
run to the marketplace to buy another combine, rent more land, hire more people, apply more spray,
etc. The knee-jerk reaction would feel good in the short term because of the band-aid effect, but what
about the future? How has the knee-jerk decision affected your future profitability? Will the lease or
finance cost of that combine be affordable for the next 2-5 years? Will the extra land grow anything, or
will it be flooded out or ravaged with disease? Will your new hire fit in with your existing team and
culture? Will that extra spray increase or decrease your profit? Wouldn’t it be better to have given these
potential crises some consideration before the season started with some planning? With planning, you
would be prepared and then make a timely and informed decision. No more knee-jerk reactions.

The biggest issue with my favorite football team came to light during the last game this past Sunday. The
head coach pulled a young quarterback from the game after he threw an interception. The young QB,
who is 23 years old and fresh out of college, started the season as 3rd in line yet found himself in the #1
slot for the last number of games because of injury. By all accounts, this young man has the skills to be
the future leader of this team…in several years, not now. He needs time to learn, to enhance his skills
and his knowledge. The best way to enhance those skills is with real life experience. On Sunday, the
head coach regressed that young man’s growth by killing his confidence when he got benched for one
mistake. The coach made a knee-jerk decision that can, and likely will, have a detrimental effect on the
future of the team.

While the future of this football team weighs heavy on the fans enthusiasm right now, your business
doesn’t have to be this way. Whether it be a crisis in personnel, equipment, weather, or markets, the
preparation and planning you put in ahead of time will save you time, anxiety, and money.
How does this relate to knowing your costs? It comes from planning. Knowing your critical crisis cost
points from investing time and effort in your management will clearly indicate where you have
sensitivities and where you have breathing room. The sensitive areas, where your return on investment
is tight, require more strategy analysis to better prepare for crisis.

Critical Crisis Cost Points

Personnel

o Key person quits mid-season (do you have a successor on the team today?)
o Injury, serious or minor (do you have a documented safety plan, insurance coverage?)

Equipment

o Does your current equipment cost per acre have room for an increase should there be
an equipment crisis?
o Is your current equipment line deficient or excessive based on your productivity,
efficiency, and cost expectations?

Weather

o Are you prepared for hail or frost, drought or flood? (i.e. do you have sufficient working
capital to handle the loss of gross margin?)

Markets

o Do you know your Unit Cost of Production so you can hedge for a profit?

Direct Questions

What have you done to prepare for crisis on your farm? Will you be making a prepared and informed
decision or a knee-jerk reaction?

What are you doing to understand your costs on your critical cost points to accelerate your ability to
make informed decisions during times of crisis?

From the Home Quarter

The planning that goes into putting together a successful football season resembles the planning it takes
to put together a successful growing season on your farm. You put together the best game plan you can
based on the assets at your disposal, tangible or intangible. You prepare for quandary by building depth
into your game plan for your critical crisis cost points. Sometimes you best plans aren’t enough;
sometimes the dilemma is greater than you could predict or the results are more damaging than you
could imagine. No matter how you slice it, your best bet is planning and being prepared by drawing the
distinction between risking your future on a quick decision in the present, or taking the charted path
keeping the long term success of your business always in mind.

The head coach of the Riders got fired before I could finish writing this article. I expect it was partly
because he refused to take any accountability for the team’s struggles. He routinely made decisions in
the present with a lack of regard for his, or his team’s, future. He arrogantly stated in interviews that
he’s a great coach and will find work if he’s let go. His unwillingness to look within himself as the leader
ultimately cost him his job. As the leader of your farm, please don’t get caught in that same syndrome.
Your future depends on it.

GFP FI 4

Knowing Your Costs – Part 2: “Misplaced Priorities”

/0 Comments/in , , , , /by

Last week, this article weighed in on the trend of increasing costs in certain areas of the farm, namely
Operations (equipment, fuel, people,) and Facilities (buildings, land, financing.) These are the two most
controllable expense areas in farm management. These are the two cost areas that have seen the
biggest increases.

Over the winter, an old colleague and friend made the following tweet through @RCGFarmWise:
tweetMoe Russell has spent well over 30 years in farm finance
and management, and he has been tracking this kind of
info for a long time. I trust his integrity and his
information. Essentially over 5 crop years, this says that
farmers have increased equipment costs 100% faster
and land costs 400% faster than they’ve increased input
costs. In a time of high commodity prices with yields that
were typically above the long term average, this was not
uncommon.

Recently I took part in a Farm Business Development Initiative (FBDI) seminar that brought together
approved consultants and learning providers (of which I am both) to discuss updates to the program.
(Lean more at https://fbdi.gov.sk.ca/) During a conversation there, I overheard one attendee saying
how he listens to farmers “bemoaning the $60/ac they spend on seed, but nary a word to the $60/ac
increase in equipment costs they just took on.”

It is not surprising to see farmers looking to inputs first when trying to find ways to cut costs. We justify
it by lamenting increases to seed, fertilizer, and chemical prices. We validate cutting inputs by
acknowledging that inputs require the highest cash cost per acre of anything else on the farm. There are
sound ways to cut inputs; I was enjoying listening to many clients describing how they are using generic
herbicides this year, focusing heavily on scouting to verify the need for fungicides versus just spraying
anyway, etc. But when I heard one who wanted to eliminate a broadleaf herbicide in his cereals to cut
costs, even though I’m no agronomist, I quickly brought risk management to that conversation. Every
decision needs to have a risk/benefit or cost/benefit consideration. There is too much at stake!
More to the tweet above, looking under the right rock is not easy because it will force each of us to
acknowledge how and where we’ve allocated our capital. If we know we should not have increased our
“operations” cost, it’s difficult to face that reality, swallow pride, and make a better (or corrective)
decision. This is magnified in year like 2015 when excess moisture ahead of seeding turned into drought
for most of the growing season, and adding to that the late spring & early fall frosts, we could find that
many will miss their production targets. Are you confident you were using the most efficient agronomic
plan possible? Will your “operations” costs be harder to manage with missed production targets? Will
you be looking under the “inputs rock” to find ways to cut costs?

It has been said many times that “you cannot shrink your way to greatness.” Cutting inputs for the sake
of reducing costs is “shrinking” your ability to generate strong revenue. Even the best marketing cannot
make up for lost production. Your priorities need to continue for you to be:

1. The most proficient manager you can be to build a strategic and tactical plan that maximizes
ROI, personal wealth, and family values;

2. The most efficient producer you can be to lower your Unit Cost of Production;

3. The most equipped marketer you can be to hedge market risk, and generate sufficient gross
margin.

By misplacing your cost cutting priority onto the critical facets of your business as listed in the 3 points
above, you would be doing more harm than good, despite best intentions.

Direct Questions

Where have your costs experienced the greatest increase (inputs, operations, facilities)?
In recognizing the 3 critical facets above that require your full investment (management, production,
marketing,) where can you find costs that can you live without?

How confident are you in your awareness and abilities to enact appropriate cost management
strategies?

From the Home Quarter

You won’t hear me condone a general prescription of “more fertilizer,” but you will hear me advocate
for “better use of fertilizer.” It’s not about the producing biggest yield; it’s not about producing at the
lowest cost; it’s about producing the best yield at the most efficient cost. And the most efficient cost
also refers to “operations” and “facilities.” The allocation of your finite resources to those costs also
needs to be highly efficient. As a banker friend of mine likes to say, “Your crop doesn’t care what color
your equipment is.”
…or how new it is.
…or how much rent the landlord is squeezing out of you.
The purpose of your business is to grow your profits, maximize your ROI (return on investment,) and
increase your wealth. Spending over $200/ac on “operations & facilities” costs will not get you there.

grass

Information Management – Healthcare vs Your Farm

/0 Comments/in , , , /by

Of all of the places one can imagine, our health care system is the preeminent entity that I believe
should be leaps and bounds ahead of everyone when it comes to managing data.

Over the last year or so, I’ve listened to my father-in-law’s observations about our healthcare system as
he led the charge relating to the changing needs of his disabled sister. He described how one nurse
would come into the hospital room, ask a series of questions, make some observations, take some
notes, and then leave. Shortly afterwards, another nurse would come into the hospital room, ask a
series of similar questions (getting similar answers,) make some observations, take some notes, and
then leave. At some point, a doctor would come into the hospital room, ask a series of similar questions
(and get similar answers,) make some observations, take some notes, and then leave. Usually these
notes where made on a chart that hung outside the hospital room door.

Some thoughts:

  • The cost incurred to have 3 highly paid and very intelligent individuals gathering similar
    information would likely astound me;
  • All of the information gatherers collected similar information, and compiled it into one paper-based record;
    Could anyone walking by a hospital room with malicious intent grab someone’s chart and leave
    that patient’s caregivers without access to critical information? Why isn’t this electronically
    secure yet (it’s only 2015 already!)
  • Patients get tired of answering the same question over and over;
  • Why wouldn’t the health regions equip each caregiver with a tablet computer that brings up a
    patient’s entire health history with the scan of a QR code that could be found on the patient’s
    wrist band?

Why am I writing about this? How is this important to you? First off, our healthcare should be of great
importance to everyone. But specifically as it relates to this blog, consider the
paragraph and bullet points above, but this time let the patient be your farm and the caregivers be your
business advisor, your lender, and your marketing advisor.

Direct Questions

How much better would it be to have all of your critical business information readily available for your
strategic partners to help you more effectively and efficiently manage your business?

How inefficient is it for each party to have to ask you for the same info? Your time is worth something
too, so wouldn’t you be better off not having to run through the same routine 3 times over?

How much risk is your business at if you were to lose, accidentally or maliciously, your historical business
information?

We’re a decade-and-a-half into the 21st century, and technology is awesome. When are we going to start
trusting it and using it to its full potential?

From the Home Quarter

I believe we have the best healthcare system in the western hemisphere, and I am by no means
criticizing any of our hard working health-care providers. But I do question the bureaucracy and
inefficiency that plagues the system (at least in the eyes of this layman.) I think we could do so much
better, which would then allow those on the front lines to spend more time providing healthcare rather
than administering information.

I believe that Western Canadian farmers are of the most efficient producers in the world, and I am by no
means criticizing any of your advancements and dedication to improving your production. But I do
question the lack of urgency and the failure to recognize the importance of having up to date critical
business information readily at your fingertips. You aren’t making the same type of “life and death”
decisions that are made daily by our health-care providers, but the decisions you make for your business
will effectively set in motion the cause and effect that can lead to life or death of your business.

Call to Action – Rate your current information management practices:

1. Can you produce your working capital figure within 2-3 minutes at your computer?

2. Can you advise what your total fertilizer cost per acre is by field? By crop?

3. Can you produce a current list of all farm assets with market values?

4. Do you keep a rolling list of cash requirements for the next 18 months? (i.e. loan payments,
property taxes, insurance premiums, etc.)

5. If you’re not willing to compile this critical information, are you willing (or can you) hire
someone to do it for you?

If you’ve answered YES to at least 4/5, congratulations, you’re ahead of the curve.
If you’ve answered YES to 3/5 or fewer, then please pick up the phone and ask for help.
(Hint: I always return voice mail messages.)

farm2

Is Data Management Really Important?

/2 Comments/in , , /by

“Every company makes information management an afterthought.”

This was something a friend of mine said this weekend as we were chatting about everything from our
respective businesses, to politics and religion, to parenting. He qualified his statement using the vehicle
we were riding in as his example; “Do the (car) manufacturers build an information management system
into the dash of each car that they can charge more for? Of course not, because no one would pay for
it.” Essentially his message was that vehicle buying consumers are less interested in knowing and
measuring all of the vehicle’s varying functions and processes, they only want the basics. They just want
a vessel to get them where they’re going, one that looks good and is comfortable/fun to drive, and has
the power and/or efficiency they desire. End of story.

I challenged his theory as it would relate to other entities (especially large corporations,) and without
hesitation, he stayed his course. I really thought that larger corporations, those with hundreds of
millions or even billions in net worth, would have enviable information management systems and
processes. My friend said, “The focus is primarily growth & profits and how to accomplish it, with
information management being thrown together afterwards.”

I reflected on my own time in corporate Canada and the (sometimes) hodge-podge of reports I would
receive to (supposedly) help me better manage my branch or my client portfolio. Even though I didn’t
want to admit it, I knew my friend was right.

So, now you’re thinking that if big business doesn’t make its own information management a priority,
why should you? I’ll give you 2 words: working capital.

Strong working capital gives any business the cushion to make mistakes. It allows business to do things
less than ideal. This is not giving permission to be less than adequate, but it’s the reality of finance.
Lenders won’t run from a borrower that has done a less than ideal job of information management
when that borrower’s working capital is very strong.

“Very strong” working capital for your farm would cover 100% of your annual cash expenses. If your
farm’s working capital is not very strong, then the argument to not make information management a
priority is very weak. Very strong working capital is not permission to be lax on managing your data. No
entity in any industry should allow their business data to not be highly managed. The risk that this
creates is high, but the opportunity cost is higher yet.

Why are farm equipment companies, seed companies, fertilizer companies, chemical companies, etc. all
so interested in farm data? They recognize the opportunity cost of not being highly responsive to their
clients. You need to be interested in your farm data so you can be highly responsive to your business
opportunities. No one will manage your data but you.

Direct Questions

Are you allowing data management to be an afterthought? Do you have the working capital to support
this (lack of) action?

Have you considered the opportunities you could leverage if your data was highly managed? How many
opportunities have been lost over the years?

Do you recognize that saying “I don’t want those big multi-nationals to mine my data so I won’t compile
it” is a weak excuse?

From the Home Quarter

Large firms can get away with inadequate data management because they have the working capital to
cushion them from the results of less than ideal decisions. Small firms, such as your farm, likely do not.
(Small firms, by definition, are measured by market capitalization and number of employees, and usually
are those under $100million net worth and/or those with fewer than 100 paid employees.) Any
decisions on your farm that could be “less than ideal” will affect your working capital, positively or
negatively. The questions then become,

  • Was the positive impact to your working capital as good as it could have been (opportunity cost)?
  • Can your existing level of working capital handle a negative impact (risk)?

At the end of the day, highly managed data will support working capital and your ability to increase it.
Working capital will support your growth strategy and your wealth goals. The two are intertwined, and
in this current environment of high risk and tight margins, you cannot afford to be without either.

If you’d like help planning your data management process or strengthening your working capital, then call me or send an email.

horizon2

Austerity

/0 Comments/in , , , /by

We’ve been hearing the word “austerity” in the media for quite a while now. Whether it be issues in the
EU, or right here in Canada (Quebec), it’s become a “buzz-word” as of late.

Merriam-Webster defines austerity as “a simple and plain quality; a situation in which there is not much
money and it is spent only on things that are necessary; austerities: things that are done to live in a
simple and plain way.” http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/austerity

Based on that definition, I like what that word represents. Maybe that’s because I grew up on a small
mixed farm in Saskatchewan in the 80’s. There wasn’t a lot to be had that wasn’t “necessary.” Don’t get
me wrong, we never went without the necessities, but I wore $20 running shoes from Army & Navy, not
Nike Air. I guess I was raised under austerity.

There was an article published in Country Guide this spring titled “Have Higher Farm Incomes Changed
the Way You Think?” It opens by describing the near perfect correlation of rising farm income to rising
new farm equipment sales. The fourth paragraph reads; “So the question is, do those periods of high
incomes create a kind of euphoria or recklessness that induces farm managers to make longterm financial decisions that could seriously reduce profits in future years, especially if revenues
fall?”

I think we know the answer to that question. And, so what now?

Well, who is considering an austerity plan for their farm?

Remember, austerity is spending only on things that are necessary. It’s easy for us a humans to blur the
lines between “nice to have” and “need to have” because we allow emotion to interfere with our
decision making.

Needs

  1. Bushels.
    You need to maximize yield in the most efficient way possible to produce at the lowest Unit Cost
    of Production your farm can provide. An Agrologist can help and should prove his/her value
    every year.
  2. Cash Flow.
    You need positive cash flow to meet debt and lease obligations, pay for inputs, land rent, wages,
    etc, etc, etc. Grain marketing is often where the best gains can be had, or can be lost. Diligent
    marketing with quality information (or lack thereof) can make or break any farm.
  3. Above Average Management.
    As you read in Growing Farm Profits Weekly Issue #17, average management was sufficient in
    the boom years, but it won’t get you through the next business cycle. Even above average
    managers find confidence in having a business advisor offer independent, unbiased advice on
    current situations, strategic plans, and risk management.

The list of “nice to have” could fill more pages that you’d care to read, or than I’d care to write. The list
of NEEDS is not exhaustive either, but in the spirit of austerity, those are the big 3 that NEED focus
(pardon the pun.)

Direct Questions

Production alone will not keep every farm afloat through the next business cycle. Are you able to
elevate your management abilities (no matter what level you’re currently at) to offer your farm its best
chance to thrive (or at least survive?)

Somebody shared a quote on Twitter that I read today: “Successful people are like a turtle on a fence
post. They didn’t get there by themselves.” -Michael Pinball Clemons
Do you have an arsenal of trusted advisors working for you to ensure you do everything it takes to be
successful?

Will your austerity plan be cutting the right costs or just the easy ones?

From the Home Quarter

It’s been said “You can’t shrink your way to greatness.” When it comes to cost cutting in an effort to
preserve cash, there is a wrong way to do it. Similar to the thinking of “good debt and bad debt,” there
are costs that should be cut, and costs that must not be cut. Interestingly enough, my phone has been
ringing lately with the voice on the other end saying, “Things are looking tough, I can’t afford to make
any mistakes. I need your help now more than ever.”
That’s what I’m here for, glad you called.

If you want help with building an austerity plan or just guidance on daily strategic decisions, call me or send an email.

farm2

Prevention or Contingency?

/0 Comments/in , , , , /by

I read Alan Weiss regularly and one of his daily blog entries from early July gave me inspiration for this
week’s article.

Alan consults to Fortune 500 Companies and solo practitioners alike, and in the entry I refer to he asks
readers, “What are you doing with your clients, helping them to fight fires or to prevent them?”
Currently, I’m doing as much fire-fighting as I am fire prevention. I enjoy the latter far more, and I know
clients do to.

The challenge is that it is hard work to build and implement a prevention plan. It’s more fun to “give’r
while the going’s good” and figure out the rest later. For many farms, later has arrived and now it’s time
to fight fire.

The prevention plan will consider 3 metrics that must be maintained:

1. Working Capital
2. Debt to Equity
3. Cash Flow

graph15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working Capital is simply the difference between your Current Assets and your Current Liabilities. To
complicate things, there is a process on how to include accurate figures for each; it’s not hard, but it
takes work. If your working capital is negative with little opportunity to return to positive, seek help
immediately.

Debt to Equity, usually represented as Debt:Equity or D:E, is a ratio of your total liabilities to your
equity. For realistic measurements, calculate your net worth for the equity figure. Net worth is fair
market value (FMV) of all “owned” assets less all liabilities. The difference is your net worth. If your
debts are $2million and your net worth is $1million, your D:E = 2:1. In some industries, a D:E of 2:1 is
acceptable; in agriculture, it is considered too high. Target your D:E at 1:1 or less.

Cash Flow is going to be the new-old buzz word. As it was the dominant focus of the 1990’s and early
2000’s, cash flow will once again be front and center. Total up you cash flow requirements for the year
and don’t leave anything out (like living expenses.) When compared to what expected gross production
revenues are going to be this year, are you happy with the result?

Direct Questions

Can you recognize and describe the importance of adequate working capital?

Debt to Equity is a measurement of “what you owe versus what you own.” Are you happy with how your
metric balances out?

Cash makes loan payments, equity does not. Are your financing obligations using up the cash you need
to pay bills, cover living expenses, or build adequate working capital?

From the Home Quarter

Your prevention plan needs to have these three metrics measured, tested, and measured again.
Strategies for how to manage your finite resources so as to build and maintain a prevention plan are
easier than fighting fires or trying to put together an emergency contingency plan when you first see
smoke. You might have excellent fire-fighting skills, and your contingency plan could be water tight, but
the fire still occurred. Isn’t it better to prevent what caused the fire then to fight it?

If you’d like help building your farm’s prevention plan, then call me or send an email.

horizon

Work-Life Balance is a Work-In-Progress

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Greetings from Katepwa Lake Saskatchewan!

For the first time in 5 years, I am taking a summer vacation. And while it is cloudy and dreary here today,
we have a nice place to stay, a boat for when the sun does shine, a beach and a golf course that are each
walking distance away…even with this one day of rain, today will be a good day.

Clearly I have not done a good job of work-life balance. Ever since I embarked into the world of
entrepreneurship as my main occupation combined with my farming activities, vacation time in the
summer has been non-existent. I have never been big on vacations because as a kid we never really
went anywhere…no matter where we went dad had to get home every night! As an adult, I have found
an appreciation for vacations despite how one must work twice as hard the week before leaving so as to
be ready to go, and twice as hard again the week after returning to catch up on the work left behind
while away. It can be easy to think “Why bother?”

Sure, why bother? You begin your vacation beat-dog-tired because you’ve probably just completed a
busy season (likely fungicide) and then work like crazy to get everything in place so you can be away.
Then it’s time to pack; in some families, this can lead to divorce! Finally, you’re ready to leave…relief!
Except you now have __ hours of travel ahead of you. Oh the joy!

Between the traffic, the heat, the screaming kids, and your exhaustion, you’re having the time of your
life!

The thoughts that we can allow ourselves to have as described above can be a great reason for those of
us who just love to work to simply not take a vacation. And whether or not you feel you need a vacation
yourself, you must to remember that it’s called “work-life balance” and that your work & your life are
about more than only you!

Direct Questions

When is the last time you took a vacation? Were you really able to get away, or were you constantly
distracted by the goings on at home?

Do you recognize that you taking a vacation is as much, or more, about family time and reconnecting
with your spouse and kids than it is about time off work for you?

Is your work-life balance out of balance? As much as you think you can answer that question, get
feedback from your family to understand the true picture.

From the Home Quarter

Today is my daughter’s 3rd Birthday, and even though it’s raining today, we’re at the lake with family
joining us and it’s going to be a great day! The sun will shine tomorrow, and if it doesn’t, we’ll be ok. The
kids don’t care where we are (at least not at their current age) and my wife is happy to be away from
“home” and all reminders of regular life. I think about work now and then, but I’ve done a good job at
keeping the phone in my pocket. I could learn to enjoy this “vacation” thing. I think I might try it again
someday.

If you’d like help planning your farm for business and personal success, then call me or send an email

GFP FI 2

The Drought Dilemma

/0 Comments/in , , , /by

The smoky haze we started inhaling yesterday drives home more than ever just how dry it really is.
#Drought15 is the Twitter hashtag to learn about how bad it is beyond our respective back doors. By all
accounts, crops are suffering and market prices are starting to reflect it. Those who are in an area that
has been, and/or remains, too wet just might be coyly denying that they ever complained about the
rain.

While it is too early to get a handle on any semblance of accurate yield estimates, people I’ve been
talking with have tossed around phrases such as “July harvest” on lentils, and described wheat crops
that are ready to push heads despite only being approximately 2 feet tall. What might be in those heads
if another hot dry windy week prevails?

As a farmer, you are an optimist. Even the most pessimistic ornery old codger you can imagine is still an
optimist if he’s a farmer. If he wasn’t, he’d never put a crop in the ground each spring. But as optimistic
as “Well, if we get one good rain in the next 4-5 days” sounds, it’s not going to make it rain. Despite the
drizzle we’re seeing today, one rain does not make a crop. If you’ve got payments to make, payables to
cover, even payroll to meet, you might want to start thinking about how that will all get done if
#Drought15 persists.

  1. Speak with your creditors.
    They’re not clueless; they hear the weather forecasts and read the crop reports. But they also
    won’t assume; they won’t assume that you’ll have trouble making payments because your crop
    is not going to meet expectations. As far as they’re concerned, you’ll be fully capable of
    satisfying the obligations you promised to make when you signed the loan or lease
    documents…unless they hear otherwise.
    And remember, your lenders are not problem fixers, so coming to them after the trouble gets
    real makes it far more difficult. They have more opportunity to help when they can be proactive.
  2. Consider your options.
    Do you remember Growing Farm Profits Weekly Issue #9? “Life and business can often be like
    snowmobiling: when trouble is ahead sometimes you need to pull back and sometimes you
    need to stay on the throttle.” What is your best option considering your crop’s development to
    date? I recently read an article discussing the possibility of reseeding barley on fields that have
    been froze out or droughted out. Considering the dire need for feed this year, cattlemen will be
    interested in green feed or silage barley. Is it time to consider how that might pencil out?
  3. Change your plans.
    The decisions you made last year and the year before were based on the best information you
    had at the time. The current situation differs greatly and probably requires a new decision.
    Swallowing pride and allowing yourself to change/reverse/discard old decisions could be exactly
    what your business needs. Nay, it IS what your business needs because your business is
    constantly changing and so should your decisions. Knowing when to do so is just as important.

Direct Questions

How would you rate yourself as far as being agile to your financial obligations in light of poor crop
conditions?

How would your stress level decrease if you took 10% of the time and effort you spend on worrying
about the existing crop conditions and used it to contact your strategic partners and advisors to amend
2015 expectations?

Are you staunchly sticking to your past decisions or are you being flexible and responsive to the needs of
your business?

From the Home Quarter

About 17 or 18 months ago, I blogged about how we need to reset what our expectation of success
really is. After the record 2013 crop, the 2014 crop year was poised to be a real disappointment in
comparison. Considering so far this year we generally went from adequate or excessive moisture in
March to a drought by mid-May, I’d suggest we look at 2015 for what it is and be realistic about what
we can call success. To give you a glimpse of what I mean, in 2014 I was working with a farm that
projected an operating loss due to the excessive moisture, crop quality issues, dropping grain prices, and
high fixed costs. The comment during planning was “OK, so we’re expecting to lose only about $300,000
in 2014; that’s decent considering what it could be.” They reset their expectation of success based on
what they saw.

Take a good hard look at your current year, be realistic with expectations, and make changes as
required. We can help make sense of it, take the emotion out of it, and assist with establishing new
plans.

If you’d like help planning your farm for business and personal success, then call me or send an email.

farm

Accountant’s Work & Management Information

/0 Comments/in , , , , /by

In the last post, you read (again) about how important good accounting is to your business. If that wasn’t
enough, here’s more.

Do you ever find yourself tiring of all the financial hub-bub in the media? It seems like every 2 or 3
months the same banks, or automakers, or grocery chains are “reporting earnings.” Well, that’s because
they do. Every quarter, the publicly traded companies release an earnings report, financial statements
as it were, to the shareholders. The shareholders are the owners of the company, and they demand
information that is accurate and on time so they can make an informed decision about increasing their
investment, standing pat, or divesting. The company is in a constant state of flux, and owners want to
know by how much their risk profile has changed in the last 3 months. Accurate and timely information
is not only demanded by the shareholders, it is the law under securities regulations.

So why are farms OK to receive their info once per year, and often as late as 5-7 months past their year-end? If the answer is, “Because the owners (shareholders) aren’t demanding it,” then I have to ask,
“Why the ____ aren’t they?”

Does your lender put more emphasis on the timing and quality of your financial statements than you
do? If your answer is “Yes,” then please keep reading. Actually, print this off and read it weekly until
Christmas.

Quality accounting is more than just minimizing income tax and filing GST & Agri-Stability. Your
accountant should be tasked with generating precise and informative reports that give you, the owner, a
representation of the financial position of your business, and the changes year over year to your farm’s
overall financial health.

If the information in those reports is of little interest to you, or if you’re embarrassed to admit you don’t
understand what the contents really mean, please don’t fret. There are many people who are available
to help including your accountant, your lender, and your business advisor. All of them WANT to help, but
they won’t insult you by assuming you don’t know. For help, first you must ask.

As for all you wonderful accountants out there reading this, please note that I will be working with each
and every one of my clients to fully utilize the financial reports that you create. I will be helping each
farm CEO make informed decisions with help in part from your reports. That said we need reports that
are useful, readable, and easy to navigate. Combining several line items from client info into one line
item on the Review Engagement does not help management make informed decisions! For example, the
account we know as “repairs and maintenance” does not on its own distinguish between equipment
repairs or building repairs unless you break it down for us. When I work with clients to determine their
equipment cost per acre, we need to know just how much R&M is equipment and how much is
something else.

I encourage everyone to have a discussion with your accountant. It’s easy to just do what we do and not
take the time to talk about what we really want. Accountants need to know about your 3 year plan so
they can offer appropriate tax advice. They also need to know if the report they prepare for you is
meeting your expectations. Not everything is negotiable, but you don’t know unless you have the
conversation!

Direct Questions

How are you utilizing the financial reports that are prepared by your accountant?

Do you have questions when you’re exploring the contents, or do you even feel like you’re reading a
foreign language when reviewing your financial reports?

How do you make decisions about the future if you’re not taking the time to evaluate and understand
past performance?

Are you getting information to your accountant in a timely fashion?

From the Home Quarter

Management decisions, if they are to be informed decisions, need to be made with quality reporting and
realistic expectations; both are key components of a sound business plan. I recently witnessed a
financing deal go south because of the lack of quality information. The account manager aptly described
the financing request plan and supporting information as GIGO: garbage in, garbage out. Other factors
that are usually afforded consideration in a financing deal were never given a chance because the poor
quality information derailed the opportunity first.

It is up to you to work with your accountant, one of your key advisors, to put together the type and
quality of reporting that will not only serve you in making management decisions, but also support your
goals when seeking opportunities for growth.

If you’d like help planning your farm for business and personal success, then call me or send an email.

emotion

Emotional Decisions: Business’ Achilles Heel

/0 Comments/in , , , , , /by

I bought a used truck last week. Since I am no longer actively farming, I decided that my beautiful ¾ ton
diesel was more truck than I needed. It took me 2 years of searching to find that truck, so some people
are astounded that I would be selling it. It was still a terrific truck, and had nothing wrong with it.

During my search for another truck, I learned bits of info here & there about the good, bad, and
otherwise regarding the models I was interested in. It’s always a challenge to sort through the noise of
those who are die-hard loyalists who cannot see anything adverse about their brand and of those who
are inherently negative and cannot find anything good to say. How does a person decide?

I wanted the replacement truck to be in the 2011-2013 range. I faced the same challenge we all face
when considering a major purchase: can I find what I want within my price range, do I accept less than
what I want to stay within my price range, or do I pay more than I planned to get what I want? In the
modern age of “instant gratification,” our society typically pays more than planned.

graph13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

While some options on my list were important, others weren’t. When considering the Ford F150, I was
firmly on the fence over engine options: 5.0L or EcoBoost? As mentioned earlier, there is a lot of noise
about these engine options. I found a consistent message between 2 salesmen and felt that was the
most honest feedback I have come across. When describing what I need out of this truck, and why I was
on the fence, one salesman replied, “Well you’re just taking the emotion right out of this decision, aren’t
you?”

Yes. Yes I am.

The fundamentals of what makes a good decision are often clouded by emotion. We get so caught up in
the “want” that we blow right past the “need.” And since we as a society will typically pay more than
planned to get what we want, it creates a perfect storm. This storm has eroded balance sheet equity for
many, and left others upside-down on vehicle & equipment loans, but always negatively impacts cash
flow.

Direct Questions

How often have you let emotion take over your decision making process?

Do you avoid making a business case for each decision because it will prove the emotional argument to
be the wrong one?

What impact are you feeling from past emotional decisions?

From the Home Quarter

Removing emotion from business decisions is a key benefit that my clients enjoy. It allows my clients to
experience greater confidence in their decisions by having me filter through their emotions. I am not on
your farm each day, so the emotion of why you’re making the decision is not felt by me, thus allowing
me to see through it and keep you on track.

The truck I sold was rare because of its features and options. It had incredibly low kilometers for its age,
and needed nothing (I’d been through it front to back over the last 2 years.) What I felt for this vehicle
was almost on the verge of love (although I have never “loved” or “named” any of my vehicles, ever.)
And while it held a special place with me, it’s a truck, a tool, an inanimate object and completely
replaceable. I sold it when I did because I knew I could get maximum value for it now. A year from now
would be significantly less. It was advertised on Friday afternoon, it was sold by Saturday, and picked up
Monday. I found the truck I wanted the Thursday before, and picked it up a week later. I took the
emotion out of the equation.

Allowing emotion to influence your decision making is like putting on blinders: all that can be seen is
what you “think” you need and no other options appear available. Let’s take the blinders off, remove
emotion from the equation, and see if we can make a business case that offers an appropriate ROI.

If you’d like help removing emotion from the decisions you make for business and personal success,
then call me or send an email.