The construction of a balance sheet is quite simple: assets on the left, liabilities plus owner’s equity on the right. As the name implies, the two sides must balance. So when liabilities are greater than the assets, there is negative equity. Yes, you can have negative equity, but not for long unless you have an incredibly patient banker.

When describing the instances above where the balance sheet gets too much emphasis, the focus is clearly on the bottom half of the balance sheet, specifically the long term assets & long term liabilities and the owner’s equity. The equity is usually provided by appreciation of long term business assets, and if the equity is built almost solely on that and not retained earnings (net profit from operations) then there is definitely too much emphasis put on the bottom half of the balance sheet, namely equity.

The top half of the balance sheet is where most of the trouble starts. The top half is where we find the current assets and current liabilities; the difference between the two is working capital. Current liabilities have grown to dangerous levels from ever increasing loan and lease payments, cash advances, and trade credit. When current liabilities exceed current assets, you have negative working capital.

If your balance sheet has negative equity and negative working capital, you are the definition of insolvent, and the next phone you make is likely 1-800-AUCTION.

Ok, so there is equity on your balance sheet, more than enough to cover off the negative working capital. A patient and understanding lender might be willing to help you tap into that equity to “recapitalize” the business.  Do that once if you need to. By the time you’ve gone to that well two or three times, you’re likely closer to needing the classifieds to find a job rather than the next deal on equipment.

Equity doesn’t pay bills. Cash does.

Why punish your cash and working capital by rushing debt repayment to create equity?

Plan for Prosperity

The next time you catch yourself, or anyone else for that matter, leaning hard on the bottom of the balance sheet, namely the equity portion, think long and hard about why the focus is not balanced between the top half and bottom half of the balance sheet.

Not only do the left and right sides of the balance sheet need to balance, but so does the top and bottom.

How did your last fiscal year turn out? What were your financial results? If you are results focused, you’ll be paying attention to metrics like:

• Net Profit
• EBITDA
• Gross Margin
• Return on Equity

Activity focused operations typically don’t review financial reporting, instead directing energy towards:

• Greasing
• Shoveling
• Driving
• Anything else…

To Plan for Prosperity

There are some who will say that “money and profit aren’t everything.” Don’t listen to them. They aren’t focused on results. Yes, health and family are more important than money because money cannot buy health or a happy family, BUT without profit no one will be happy.

Profit is the fuel for your business. And like the diesel in your tractor, if you’re not making sure you have enough, things are going to stall.

EBITDA is an acronym for Earnings Before Interest Taxes Depreciation & Amortization. It is your business’ profit from operations. More than just understanding it, being intimate with how it affects your business is critically important.

EBITDA is pure because it does not include the effects of financing decisions (this is why is excludes interest,) accounting decisions (this is why it excludes depreciation & amortization,) and tax environments (this is why it excludes income taxes paid or payable.) It simply shows just how slick of an operator you really are.

If your accountant isn’t including this in your financial statements, you can figure it out pretty easily using the formula above. How has your EBITDA been trending over the last 5 years? Have you considered the reason why?

Your lender is keenly interested in your EBITDA. In fact, he or she will calculate it internally and measure it against your total debt payments required in the next 12 months. It is called “debt service coverage” or DSC for short, and is a deal breaker if it doesn’t meet your lenders’ minimum standards.

For many farms, net equity has been on a very positive trend over the last several years. While this is good news, like any news we can’t just take it at face value. What is the underlying story? If equity has been increasing from appreciation of asset values (namely land) and not from retained earnings, then it does not build confidence that the operation is profitable. If the operation is profitable, it is capable of growth and meeting loan repayment schedules (those same loans that help fund the growth.)

If a business is not retaining any earnings within the business, it limits its ability to fund growth, transition, etc.

To Plan for Prosperity

Recognize that EBITDA is the measure of your business’ operating performance. It has a key accountability in growing your business’ net equity. It is heavily relied upon by lenders.

1. Calculate your EBITDA. Look at how it is trending. Acknowledge what it affecting the trend.
2. Understand your lender’s debt service coverage (DSC) calculations.
3. Decipher what has had the greatest inpact on your net equity: appreciation of assets, retained earnings, or both?

Your relationship with your EBITDA should be very, very close; some might even say “intimate.”

For too long, “cost of production” was “inputs.” Seed, chemical, and fertilizer were all that were considered when discussing “cost of production.” Slowly, the recognition of fixed, or operating, or overhead costs came into play. But even then, I still find that much is left to be desired.

Regular readers of this commentary know that I preach “Unit Cost of Production (UnitCOP).” The thinking behind UnitCOP is to evaluate what it cost your business to produce one unit, whether that be a bushel of canola, a tonne of barley, an “eight-weight” steer, a kilogram of butterfat, etc. Obviously, the more units you can produce without increasing overall costs lowers your UnitCOP, as does producing the same number of units but with a lesser total cost.

The mindset of including all costs and expenses when determining cost of production continue to evolve. When in discussions with anyone, client or stranger, about cost of production, I often need to look for clarification about their parameters by asking “Whole farm?” Even this leaves much open to interpretation: whole farm to some means “every acre.” To me, it means every acre, yes, but also every expense.

An example that makes me scratch my head is when I read new articles containing info or quotes from someone in Manitoba Ag. Recently, I read this article about management of agronomic economics, when as with other similarly sourced articles I’ve read in the past the content describes “break even prices and yields” for various crops excluding labor. Why? Will the crop magically seed and harvest itself?!?!

Every cost, every expense must be considered when calculating cost of production. Right down to the paperclips for the office.

To Plan for Prosperity

The business of farming is difficult enough without making it harder to define profitability by ignoring some of your costs. While paperclips may not be critical to “production,” as a farmer/rancher/dairy-person/etc, you are in the business or producing grain/beef/milk/etc. And the costs to run your production business includes things like paperclips.

When evaluating results that might not have met expectations, ask yourself if you remembered the paperclips.

Inventory

Record your annual inventory accurately. This is important when reconciling your production and your sales to calculate your operating income. One of my more recent clients hadn’t implemented clear tactics for recording year-end inventory at the end of their 2015 crop year. Now, as we review past years, we are challenged to understand why they show an operating loss that year. There are anomalies in many income and expense categories when trended year over year. I challenged the accountant to explain, but since the accountant does not perform any type of “checks and balances,” only a compilation of client provided information, my clients are now facing the obtrusive task of reconciling each and every invoice & slip to see if there was a recording error. While you may be wondering, “What’s the big deal” the fact of the matter is that this “not a big deal” contributes to a reported $300,000 loss which is putting the banker at some discomfort. Would it still be “not a big deal” if the operating credit limit gets slashed because the financial reporting doesn’t support the existing borrowing limit? Is this as simple as an incorrect inventory figure provided by the farmer to the accountant because of slack or sloppy “estimates” of what’s in the bin?

Reporting

Readers of this weekly commentary have heard enough of my ranting about accrual adjustments and their importance to evaluating your business year over year. So let’s bypass the stated obvious and look down another path: what are you not seeing in your financial statement that would be beneficial for management purposes? I am a proponent of “more is better” when it comes to information (we can always discard what is not necessary much easier than trying to make decisions with vague information by yearning for what is not there.) As an example of a basic start, I support breaking the single line item of “Repairs & Maintenance” into two separate lines: one for equipment, the other for buildings. If you, as management, are trying to discern the subtleties of your various costs, would it be helpful to have this separation made?
There are many other suggestions that could be offered, but in the end, it’s your report so ask for what you want.

Depreciation

It continues to be the scourge of farmers to this day: income tax. It then is no wonder that farmers love depreciation. It’s a non-cash expense that reduces taxable income! But Kristjan Hebert tweeted a very valid concern that all farmers should think about. Depreciation is hidden…from sight. It is not hidden from the government, and the government has ways of collecting if you don’t manage your accumulated depreciation.
Accountants inherently assume that all farmers want to maximize depreciation expense to reduce taxable income, so rarely will your accountant initiate a depreciation conversation with you. This does not mean that if your accountant does not initiate the conversation that there is nothing to discuss! Talk to your accountant about your capital asset “depreciation pools.” Share your capital expenditure (CapEx) plan. Set the appropriate rate of depreciation that is in your best tax planning interests (HINT: you don’t have to take the maximum just because you can.)

To Plan for Prosperity

The financial statements created by your accountant is a package of some of the most critical management tools you need to make informed decisions. You not only have the right, but the obligation to create a report that is useful and meaningful to your management needs (and your accountant, as a strategic business partner, is more than willing to work with you…if you ask.)
1. You bear the responsibility for recording and reporting your inventory accurately.
2. Ask your accountant to create reports that are useful to you based on how you want to evaluate your business (within acceptable accounting practices, or course.)
3. Have a strategic discussion with your accountant about depreciation (HINT: it helps to have a strategy to discuss.)

It’s your business. Be accountable for it.

Like so many other aspects of life and business, going on the cheap, finding the lowest cost solution, spending as little as possible often has the opposite effect than what is desired. When I needed steel toed work boots for the farm, I used to spend about $120 for “cheap” boots from the discount or department store. The last pair I bought were Red Wing and cost me well over $300. They outlasted 2-3 “cheap” pair and my feet were far more comfortable during those long 18 hour days at seeding, keeping me less fatigued. Was there greater value in the more expensive boots? You bet there was!

If cost is your #1 concern when considering options for managing your data and business information, then please consider why you buy the name brand hand tools, cars, trucks, and farm equipment that you do? If cost was the only concern, wouldn’t we all be driving cheap $10,000 cars, using WalMart wrenches made in China, and farming with Belarus tractors?

Find what works for you and just use it. If you don’t know what works for you, then ask for help. I am meeting with an office organization expert this week to get the help I need in creating a work-space that is better organized and more suited to my work flow.

Last week we discussed “Using Your Financial Information,” but if you aren’t managing your information adequately, it will be difficult to use, and leave you to make decisions with information that is not accurate. We expect our financial institution to provide us with accurate statements, and we’d be pretty upset if the information they provided us wasn’t spot on. We need to have the same expectation of ourselves.

If doing your own income and expense entries, set aside 1 hour twice a week to input accounting data. I used to leave mine until it was time to file GST every quarter. I have found that there is value to letting my accountant’s office handle this task so I can focus on my business. In 2016, I’ll be leaving the data entry to my accountant.

The first piece of information I prefer to offer to new clients is a Unit Cost of Production calculation. This requires current and accurate figures for crop inputs, yield and price, operating costs, and overhead costs. To know what it costs to produce one bushel of canola or one tonne of barley on your farm requires accurate info, otherwise it’s still a guess! Using this accurate information is very empowering!

Here is a list of Best Practices to consider implementing for managing your farm’s financial and business data:

• Research and fully utilize an agronomic data platform; ideally it would require minimal manual entry on your part by gleaning info from your tractor/sprayer/combine consoles, and also easily convert to your accounting software.
• Manage income and expenses regularly: don’t simply fill the shoe-box! Designate 1 hour twice per week to data entry.
• Evaluate the worth of your time relative to tasks you do, and delegate accordingly.
  (IE. if you’re the CEO helping the hired men sweep out bins, you’re not allocating your time very well!)
• Consider using outside help, or a designated employee, to manage date entry if you deduce that your time is better spent elsewhere.
• Keep income & expenses, assets & liabilities, and cash flow records current each month.

Direct Questions

How are you best utilizing the resources you have available to compile your data? Are you using the right people, or slugging through on your own?

What data and information management tools are you using? Do they satisfy your needs? How are you using the reports they create?

Does managing financial information take a back seat to other tasks? What do you need to make it more of a priority?

From the Home Quarter

Choosing an information management platform is a daunting task. But it is less daunting than trying to make informed decisions with little or no usable information. The learning curve is steep at the beginning, yet once you’ve done all your set-up, keeping it updated is relatively easy. Making information management a priority can be less easy, depending on mindset. The benefits you’ll enjoy from being equipped to make informed decisions immediately as required are similar to the benefits you enjoy from getting your entire crop seeded early into warm moist soil. Even emergence on an early seeded crop is as satisfying as highly informed strategic management decisions…and just as important!

For those of us on a December 31 year-end, the calendar has turned and the clock is ticking. If you haven’t had a planning meeting with your accountant prior to now, it’s likely too late to act on some of the options you had.

When are you able to get your information in to your accountant? My mentor threw down the gauntlet last year when he showed me that his accountant had his financial statements prepared a mere 28 days after his fiscal year end. That’s some WOW factor there! For my file, I’m shooting for thirty-five days or less; target: early/mid-February.

For me to help my accountant meet my goal of a 35 day turnaround, I need to provide him with accurate information as fast as possible. I need to provide clear information on income and expenses (not a shoebox full of invoices and receipts.) I need to provide a detailed report on changes in my fixed assets over the year, my accounts receivable at year end, etc. The better the quality of info I provide to him, the faster he can get my file off his “To Do” pile and onto the “Done” pile.

It is a typical comment made every year: we have to wait for the bank, and other creditors, statements before the final month report can be ready to send to the accountant. I’m not waiting. I’m logging into my online banking and retrieving transaction info right away. The details are there, so why let this time go to waste?

When getting your taxes and reporting completed as quick as possible, the benefits are many:

1. You will get ahead of your accountant’s busiest time, which  makes him/her happy!
2. You will get your bank annual review done earlier and on time, which makes them happy!
3. You will receive your financial reporting earlier allowing you to fully analyze last year’s results and make improved decisions for this year accordingly.
4. You will be equipped to seek new credit before seeding, if required.

The government has filing deadlines for taxes, the bank has reporting deadlines for your annual review. To receive your December 31 financial statements in August because it took you so long to get your info in to your accountant provides you, and your financial partners, little use. The information in those reports is too old because so much has changed on your farm since the date on the statements. Would you write a cheque in August based on the balance you see in your December bank statement?

Direct Questions

What systems and processes do you have in place to compile your business and financial information as quickly and accurately as possible?

How are you using your financial information to make business decisions?

Have you discussed with your accountant as to how he/she prefers to receive information from you? Making their jobs easier will get you higher quality reports much faster.

From the Home Quarter

Getting your year-end completed quickly will help you be more profitable. When your statements are early (or at least on time,) you create opportunity with your creditors. Opportunity with your creditors creates strategies for growth (and possible lower borrowing costs.) Strategies for growth create opportunities to expand, increase efficiency, control expenses, etc…all which lead to greater profitability.

And it is all starts with getting your information compiled and delivered to your accountant fast and on time.

This was something a friend of mine said this weekend as we were chatting about everything from our
respective businesses, to politics and religion, to parenting. He qualified his statement using the vehicle
we were riding in as his example; “Do the (car) manufacturers build an information management system
into the dash of each car that they can charge more for? Of course not, because no one would pay for
it.” Essentially his message was that vehicle buying consumers are less interested in knowing and
measuring all of the vehicle’s varying functions and processes, they only want the basics. They just want
a vessel to get them where they’re going, one that looks good and is comfortable/fun to drive, and has
the power and/or efficiency they desire. End of story.

I challenged his theory as it would relate to other entities (especially large corporations,) and without
hesitation, he stayed his course. I really thought that larger corporations, those with hundreds of
millions or even billions in net worth, would have enviable information management systems and
processes. My friend said, “The focus is primarily growth & profits and how to accomplish it, with
information management being thrown together afterwards.”

I reflected on my own time in corporate Canada and the (sometimes) hodge-podge of reports I would
receive to (supposedly) help me better manage my branch or my client portfolio. Even though I didn’t
want to admit it, I knew my friend was right.

So, now you’re thinking that if big business doesn’t make its own information management a priority,
why should you? I’ll give you 2 words: working capital.

Strong working capital gives any business the cushion to make mistakes. It allows business to do things
less than ideal. This is not giving permission to be less than adequate, but it’s the reality of finance.
Lenders won’t run from a borrower that has done a less than ideal job of information management
when that borrower’s working capital is very strong.

“Very strong” working capital for your farm would cover 100% of your annual cash expenses. If your
farm’s working capital is not very strong, then the argument to not make information management a
priority is very weak. Very strong working capital is not permission to be lax on managing your data. No
entity in any industry should allow their business data to not be highly managed. The risk that this
creates is high, but the opportunity cost is higher yet.

Why are farm equipment companies, seed companies, fertilizer companies, chemical companies, etc. all
so interested in farm data? They recognize the opportunity cost of not being highly responsive to their
clients. You need to be interested in your farm data so you can be highly responsive to your business
opportunities. No one will manage your data but you.

Direct Questions

Are you allowing data management to be an afterthought? Do you have the working capital to support
this (lack of) action?

Have you considered the opportunities you could leverage if your data was highly managed? How many
opportunities have been lost over the years?

Do you recognize that saying “I don’t want those big multi-nationals to mine my data so I won’t compile
it” is a weak excuse?

From the Home Quarter

Large firms can get away with inadequate data management because they have the working capital to
cushion them from the results of less than ideal decisions. Small firms, such as your farm, likely do not.
(Small firms, by definition, are measured by market capitalization and number of employees, and usually
are those under $100million net worth and/or those with fewer than 100 paid employees.) Any
decisions on your farm that could be “less than ideal” will affect your working capital, positively or
negatively. The questions then become,

• Was the positive impact to your working capital as good as it could have been (opportunity cost)?
• Can your existing level of working capital handle a negative impact (risk)?

At the end of the day, highly managed data will support working capital and your ability to increase it.
Working capital will support your growth strategy and your wealth goals. The two are intertwined, and
in this current environment of high risk and tight margins, you cannot afford to be without either.

If you’d like help planning your data management process or strengthening your working capital, then call me or send an email.

Do you ever find yourself tiring of all the financial hub-bub in the media? It seems like every 2 or 3
months the same banks, or automakers, or grocery chains are “reporting earnings.” Well, that’s because
they do. Every quarter, the publicly traded companies release an earnings report, financial statements
as it were, to the shareholders. The shareholders are the owners of the company, and they demand
information that is accurate and on time so they can make an informed decision about increasing their
investment, standing pat, or divesting. The company is in a constant state of flux, and owners want to
know by how much their risk profile has changed in the last 3 months. Accurate and timely information
is not only demanded by the shareholders, it is the law under securities regulations.

So why are farms OK to receive their info once per year, and often as late as 5-7 months past their year-end? If the answer is, “Because the owners (shareholders) aren’t demanding it,” then I have to ask,
“Why the ____ aren’t they?”

Does your lender put more emphasis on the timing and quality of your financial statements than you
do? If your answer is “Yes,” then please keep reading. Actually, print this off and read it weekly until
Christmas.

Quality accounting is more than just minimizing income tax and filing GST & Agri-Stability. Your
accountant should be tasked with generating precise and informative reports that give you, the owner, a
representation of the financial position of your business, and the changes year over year to your farm’s
overall financial health.

If the information in those reports is of little interest to you, or if you’re embarrassed to admit you don’t
understand what the contents really mean, please don’t fret. There are many people who are available
to help including your accountant, your lender, and your business advisor. All of them WANT to help, but
they won’t insult you by assuming you don’t know. For help, first you must ask.

As for all you wonderful accountants out there reading this, please note that I will be working with each
and every one of my clients to fully utilize the financial reports that you create. I will be helping each
farm CEO make informed decisions with help in part from your reports. That said we need reports that
are useful, readable, and easy to navigate. Combining several line items from client info into one line
item on the Review Engagement does not help management make informed decisions! For example, the
account we know as “repairs and maintenance” does not on its own distinguish between equipment
repairs or building repairs unless you break it down for us. When I work with clients to determine their
equipment cost per acre, we need to know just how much R&M is equipment and how much is
something else.

I encourage everyone to have a discussion with your accountant. It’s easy to just do what we do and not
take the time to talk about what we really want. Accountants need to know about your 3 year plan so
they can offer appropriate tax advice. They also need to know if the report they prepare for you is
meeting your expectations. Not everything is negotiable, but you don’t know unless you have the
conversation!

Direct Questions

How are you utilizing the financial reports that are prepared by your accountant?

Do you have questions when you’re exploring the contents, or do you even feel like you’re reading a
foreign language when reviewing your financial reports?

How do you make decisions about the future if you’re not taking the time to evaluate and understand
past performance?

Are you getting information to your accountant in a timely fashion?

From the Home Quarter

Management decisions, if they are to be informed decisions, need to be made with quality reporting and
realistic expectations; both are key components of a sound business plan. I recently witnessed a
financing deal go south because of the lack of quality information. The account manager aptly described
the financing request plan and supporting information as GIGO: garbage in, garbage out. Other factors
that are usually afforded consideration in a financing deal were never given a chance because the poor
quality information derailed the opportunity first.

It is up to you to work with your accountant, one of your key advisors, to put together the type and
quality of reporting that will not only serve you in making management decisions, but also support your
goals when seeking opportunities for growth.

If you’d like help planning your farm for business and personal success, then call me or send an email.

• I cannot stress with enough occurrences (frequency.)
• I cannot stress with enough emphasis (urgency.)
• I cannot stress with enough significance (magnitude.)

You’ve read how I feel about good accounting: you get what you pay for, and if you want to go cheap you’ll get that kind of service.

In early 2015, one of my clients had decided to move their accounting to a quality accounting firm that is
strong in ag. Previously, they were using a service that, while providing a nice financial statement (more
than just a tax preparer,) offered little in the way of consult or advice. As we are trying to move the
financial reporting to the new firm, the old service provider has been unable to clarify a “due to/due
from shareholders” line item in the statements that will have significant bearing on future tax planning.
This solidified to my clients the reasons they were moving from this “low-cost” provider to a quality
accountant in a reputable firm.

As the new firm was reconciling 2014 for my clients, it was discovered that their previous accountant
had not submitted the GST reports correctly for a number of years. The impact will be tens-of-thousands
of dollars. What other information is now suspect to scrutiny? What other ramifications might there be?
In this case, there will likely be a GST audit because the old accountant’s lack of quality work will
BENEFIT my clients to a GST REFUND of an estimated $56,000!

Direct Questions

How much more money was potentially left off the table (i.e Agri-Stability) for these clients? They’ve
come off of a string of tough years due to excess moisture.

How valuable is it to invest a few thousand more each year with a quality accountant to ensure you’re
getting accurate reporting?

Do you ask questions of your accountant, or do you accept what they say without further inquiry? Have
you discussed with your accountant your long term business plans?

From the Home Quarter

It took about 2 seconds during a phone call on Friday between my clients and their new accountants for
my clients to see that the new accountants just paid for themselves. And while a GST audit will be
uncomfortable, the future comfort (and confidence) that the reporting will be on spec and on time is of
great value. We’re all eager to see what else this new firm can find.

If you, as a businessperson, don’t value the financial reporting that your accountant creates, then you
will likely see accounting as an expense that you are trying to minimize. Accounting is one of those
services where you get what you pay for, and going on the cheap can be costly, as my clients will testify.
If you cheap out because you don’t value accounting, I expect your business results would reflect it.

If you’d like help planning your farm for business and personal success, then call me or send an email.